Welcome to the arena

Here you will find my opinions about the application of political principles to the news of the day. My perspective is clearly from the conservative point of view. This is a place to express my concerns, passions, irritations, and commentary as they apply to the current political issues of the day. Political is defined loosely in this blog. There may be posts that are not strictly political, such as movie reviews, medical topics, religious commentary and thoughts on history. I hope interest will be generated by blending my thoughts with current events. I anticipate that there will be honest disagreement. I encourage feedback to my posts with the goal of achieving clarity of disagreement. I will strive to keep the conversation polite and respectful, while avoiding political correctness and maintaining tension to keep things exciting. Hopefully, friends and family will enjoy frequenting the arena for a little intellectual stimulation and good ol' fashioned debate.

Friday, July 17, 2009

Be Scared, VERY SCARED!



Check out this graph of federal debt held by the public as a percentage of the gross domestic product (GDP)

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) is a non-partisan government agency that provides "objective, insightful, timely, and clearly presented information about budgetary and economic issues." The current director is Douglas Elmendorf. He has just released a very sobering analysis of government spending on his blog site about the long-term federal budget outlook.

This analysis proves that federal government spending is unsustainable. The scary part is that this analysis does not include the huge, newly proposed, government take over of the energy and healthcare industries.

Here are some key quotes from the analysis:

"Measured relative to GDP, almost all of the projected growth in federal spending other than interest payments on the debt stems from the three largest entitlement programs—Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security." (Notice liberals that defense spending is not the major federal expense, it is entitlement programs by far.)

"Thus, reducing overall government spending relative to what would occur under current fiscal policy would require fundamental changes in the trajectory of federal health spending." (I've got an idea, let's give healthcare to everyone and let the federal government pay for it.)

"Meanwhile, as depicted below, government spending on all activities other than Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and interest on federal debt—a broad category that includes national defense and a wide variety of domestic programs—is projected to decline or stay roughly stable as a share of GDP in future decades." (What, you mean defense spending isn't the problem?).

This is a classic example of the economic consequences of turning individual responsibility over to the government to create a nanny state.

No comments: